Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bruce Guenther

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Nakon 00:18, 27 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Bruce Guenther

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

promotional and mildly notable at best. We have no good specific criteria for curators, but borderline notability combined with clear promotionalism is an equally good reason.

The style of this indicates writing by a PR agent: putting the prior positions at the end, with the list of current exhibitions as the main content. (and, for good measure, omitting any biographical details and not documenting the material provided) DGG ( talk ) 04:46, 11 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions. AllyD (talk) 07:34, 11 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete non-notable museum curator.John Pack Lambert (talk) 20:40, 11 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 02:23, 19 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Several Portland-area news articles are available, sbut they are all regarding his retirement, which makes it WP:BLP1E at most. The page is nauseatingly promotional... I cut a chunk from the lede. HappyValleyEditor (talk) 21:34, 21 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.